QUEEN HILLARY!!! I AM NOT A CROOK--WELL MAYBE A LITTLE!!

  
What voters know about Hillary Clinton: She's a crook

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
 Published February 04, 2016


This has not been a good week for Hillary Clinton.
She prevailed over Sen. Bernie Sanders in the Iowa Democratic presidential caucuses by less than four tenths of one percent of all votes cast, after having led him in polls in Iowa at one time by 40 percentage points.

In her statement to supporters, standing in front of her gaunt and listless looking husband, she was not able to mouth the word “victory” or any of its standard variants. She could barely hide her contempt for the Iowa Democrats who disserted her.

Sanders isn’t even a Democrat. According to official Senate records, he is an “Independent Socialist” who votes to organize the Senate with the Democrats, and sits on the Senate floor with them.
Clinton, of course, is the heiress to the mightiest Democratic political apparatus in the land. Hence the question: What do the Iowa Democrats know that caused thousands of them to flee from her?
They know she is a crook.

On the Friday before Monday’s caucuses, the State Department, which Clinton headed in President Obama’s first term, revealed that it discovered 22 top-secret emails on the private computer server to which Clinton diverted all her governmental email traffic. This acknowledgement marks a radical departure from previous State Department pronouncements and is a direct repudiation of Clinton’s repeated assertions.

She has repeatedly asserted that she neither sent nor received anything “marked classified” using her private email server. The State Department, until last Friday, has backed that up by claiming that while the substance of at least 1,300 of her emails was confidential, secret or top secret, they were not “marked” as such when she dealt with them.

These are word games. First, under the law, nothing is “marked classified.” The markings are “confidential” or “secret” or “top secret,” and Clinton knows this.

Second, under the law, it is not the markings on the email headers that make the contents state secrets; it is the vulnerability of the contents of the emails to impair the government’s national security mission that rationally characterizes them as secrets.

Clinton knows this because she signed an oath on Jan. 22, 2009 recognizing that state secrets retain their secrecy status whether “marked or unmarked” by any of the secrecy designations. She knows as well that, under the law, the secretary of state is charged with knowing state secrets when she comes upon them.

Yet, in order to further Clinton’s deceptive narrative, the State Department has consistently claimed that it retroactively marked at least 1,300 emails as state secrets. It did this until last Friday.
Last Friday, the State Department revealed that 22 emails it found on Clinton’s private server were in fact top secret, and were in fact marked top secret, and were in fact sent to or received from President Obama. This is a revelation that substantially undermines Clinton’s political arguments and is catastrophic to her legal position.

Politically, Clinton has lost the final argument in her public arsenal -- that she did not recognize top-secret data unless it was marked as top secret. She has also lost the ability to claim, as she has repeatedly, that she neither sent nor received anything marked classified, as meaningless as that phrase is.

Legally, the ground under Clinton continues to crumble. The more she denies, the more she admits. How can that be? That is so because her denials are essentially an admission of ignorance, forgetfulness or negligence, and, under the law, these are not defenses to the failure to safeguard state secrets entrusted to the secretary of state. They are, instead, recognition of that failure.
Late Monday afternoon, before the Iowa caucuses convened and after Clinton’s political folks had lobbied their former colleagues at the State Department to re-characterize what they found and revealed late last week, the State Department reversed itself and claimed that the 22 emails were not “marked” top secret.

It was too little and too late. The cat was out of the bag and Iowa Democrats knew it.
Few really believed that the State Department would state publicly that the 22 emails were top secret and then state publicly that they were not, without a political motivation and irrespective of the truth. All this is infuriating to the FBI, which perceives these word games as mocking its fidelity to the rule of law.

Sanders’ presence in the Democratic primaries will continue to give Democrats who mistrust Clinton a safe political haven. But he is not Clinton’s real worry.
Her real worry is an FBI committed to the rule of law and determined to fortify national security by gathering the evidence of her mishandling state secrets.
Let’s be as blunt about this as the FBI will be: Causing state secrets to reside in a nonsecure, nongovernmental venue, whether done intentionally or negligently, constitutes the crime of espionage.

And there is more. When asked about the consequences of Clinton’s brazen exposure of state secrets to anyone who knows how to hack into a nonsecure computer, an intelligence operative winced as if in pain when he remarked that the nation’s then chief diplomat surely compromised the “sources, methods, and lives” of her colleagues.

Even Democrats who see Clinton as a symbol of their long-time wish for a progressive female in the Oval Office are beginning to recognize that anyone who has jeopardized American lives for political gain is unworthy of their votes, unworthy of their trust and unworthy of public office.

Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel.
/**

NO SURPRISE TO ME!!!

A friend from Washington D.C. wrote:

“When I heard that France had bombed a key ISIS stronghold, I looked out the window to see if the White House was still there."

THE REPUBLICAN DILEMA!!!

The Republican establishment still does not know what is going on in our country politically.  The funniest thing is that while the Republican establishment is focusing on defeating Trump they do not understand that it is the dissatisfaction of millions of voters who no longer have any use for those in charge, either party.  They can knock off Trump (maybe) but that will be the beginning of a political revolt not the end; what is happening is a political revolt/movement, Trump only tapped into it.  So their theory is shoot the messenger and the message will go away.

It is obvious that we, as a country, do not want any more radical Muslims coming into our country until we can make sure they will not become pre-occupied with killing our children and soft targets that can’t shoot back.  Obama likes to say when the radical Muslims do kill our innocent civilians and children, their only justification is those they kill are Americans,  that it is gun violence, because it fits into his political agenda; NO STUPID IT IS CALLED WAR!!! 

On black Friday 185,000 people purchased guns; they are afraid; they are afraid of Obama, the liberals who don’t have a clue what is going on and the radical Muslims who we are at war with.

Obama does not and will not realize or recognize the fact that war is a contact sport; he needs to get over it and get serious about protecting our citizens.

I have one question that needs to be asked to Obama and Clinton; how much money did you both take from Muslims in contributions or graft???

HILLARY!!!

Bill Clinton's Loving Wife,   
 by Dick Morris , former Bill Clinton political advisor.

 HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT  WOULD BE THE DEATH KNELL OF AMERICA
  Bill Clinton’s loving wife.

Her winning in 2016 means the final death knell for America! Her whole public life has been a LIE.
By Dick Morris, former political advisor to President Bill Clinton.

If you happen to see the Bill Clinton five minute TV ad for Hillary in which he introduces the commercial by saying he wants to share some things we may not know about Hillary’s background, beware as I was there for most of their presidency and know them better than just about anyone.

I offer a few corrections

Bill says:  "In law school Hillary worked on legal services for the poor."

The facts are:  Hillary’s main extra-curricular activity in law school was helping the Black Panthers, on trial in Connecticut for torturing   and killing a federal agent. She went to court every day as part of a law student monitoring committee trying to spot civil rights violations and develop grounds for appeal.

Bill says:  "Hillary spent a year after graduation working on a children's rights project for poor kids."

The facts are:  Hillary interned with Bob Truehaft, the head of the California Communist Party.

She met Bob when he represented the Panthers and traveled all the way to San Francisco to take an internship with him.


Bill says:  "Hillary could have written her own job ticket, but she turned down all the lucrative job offers."

The facts are:  She flunked the DC bar exam, yes, flunked, it is a matter of record, and only passed the Arkansas bar. She had no job offers in Arkansas, none, and only got hired by the University of Arkansas Law School at Fayetteville because Bill was already teaching there. She did not join the prestigious Rose Law Firm until Bill became Arkansas Attorney General and was made a partner only after he was elected Arkansas Governor.

Bill says:  "President Carter appointed Hillary to the Legal Services Board of Directors and she became its chairman. "

The facts are:  The appointment was in exchange for Bill's support   for Carter in his 1980 primary against Ted Kennedy. Hillary then became chairman in a coup in which she won a majority away from Carter's choice to be chairman.

Bill says:  "She served on the board of the Arkansas Children's Hospital."

The facts are:  Yes she did. But her main board activity, not mentioned by Bill, was to sit on the Wal-Mart board of directors, for a substantial fee. She was silent about their labor and health care practices.

Bill says:  "Hillary didn't succeed at getting health care for all Americans in 1994 but she kept working at it and helped to create the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) that provides five million children with health insurance."

The facts are:  Hillary had nothing to do with creating CHIP. It was included in the budget deal between Clinton and Republican Majority Leader Senator Trent Lott. I know; I helped to negotiate the deal. The money came half from the budget deal and half from the Attorney Generals' tobacco settlement. Hillary had nothing to do with either source of funds.

Bill says:  "Hillary was the face of America all over the world."

The facts are:  Her visits were part of a program to get her out of town so that Bill would not appear weak by feeding stories that Hillary was running the White House. Her visits abroad were    entirely touristic and symbolic and there was no substantive diplomacy on any of them.

Bill says:  "Hillary was an excellent Senator who kept fighting for children's and women's issues."

The facts are:  Other than totally  meaningless legislation like changing the names on courthouses and post offices, she has passed only four substantive pieces of legislation. One set up a national park in Puerto Rico . A second provided respite care for family members helping their relatives through Alzheimer’s or other conditions. And   two were routine bills to aid 911 victims and responders which were sponsored by the entire NY delegation. Presently she is trying to have the US memorialize the Woodstock fiasco of 40 years ago.

.......................................

Here is what bothers me more than anything else about Hillary Clinton. She has done everything possible to weaken the President and our country (that's you and me!) when it comes to the war on terror.

1. She wants to close GITMO and move the combatants to the USA where they would have access to our legal system.

2. She wants to eliminate the monitoring of suspected Al Qaeda phone calls to/from the USA.

3. She  wants to grant constitutional rights to enemy combatants captured on the battlefield.

4. She   wants to eliminate the monitoring of money transfers between suspected Al   Qaeda cells and supporters in the USA.

5. She wants to eliminate the type of interrogation tactics used by the military & CIA where coercion might be used when questioning known terrorists even though such tactics might save American lives.

One cannot think of a single bill Hillary has introduced or a single comment she has made that would tend to strengthen our country in the War on Terror. But, one can think of a lot of comments she has made that weaken our country and makes it more dangerous situation for all of us.

Bottom line:  She goes hand in hand with the ACLU on far too many issues where common sense is abandoned.

Share this with everyone you know & ask them to prove Dick Morris wrong. Think about it - he's (Dick Morris) said all of this openly, thus if he were not truthful he'd   be liable for defamation of character!

And you better believe Hillary would sue him.

NO COMMENT NEEDED!!!

https://www.youtube.com/embed/4ISTbT-R9hs

NO AMERICAN POLITICAL LEADERSHIP!!!

As we watch the major news networks the one thing that stands out is the total lack of US Leadership and common sense.  It seems our misguided president is more concerned with political correctness and the proper names for our terrorist enemies than he is about protecting our citizens.

 

The last Democratic Debate looked more like Moe, Larry and Curley in a three stooge’s skit than potential leaders for our country.  I’m trying to figure out if climate change/global warming killed and wounded almost 400 kids in Paris; I know I’m just a dumb assed farm boy but the answer will come to me shortly.

 

I am starting to see a political pattern that is building for the next election and I would not have predicted it until now; but, it looks like there will be a Republican sweep from the president down to the local elections.  The Republicans have not done a good job leading; but, I believe the voters will give them a pass because of Obama.  More and more people who were neutral on the Muslim issue with Obama are now saying he is either a Muslim or took huge sums of campaign funds from them when he ran for president.  The other factor is people do not believe a thing he is saying; when you lose your credibility in leadership you’re done.

 

If the Democratic voters continue to make excuses for Obama and continue to blame everything on Bush, they will all go down the tubes.  The voters are more interested in the next election and are proving to anti establishment, in both parties.

THE BIGGEST REPUBLICAN CIRCUS IN RECENT HISTORY!!!

As the greatness of our country is coming to a close under the Obama administration and all the Republican Presidential Candidates talking about bringing our country back from the brink of destruction, it all sounds good; but, it is getting boring and repetitive, when you hear candidates talking about “safe zones” and “no fly zones” over Syria, run the other way.  Unless you’re willing to go to war with Russia over a country that is not, has not, and will never be our ally.  In fact I don’t think it is much better than a large kitty litter box.

This is a part of the world we will end up fighting.  While we were negotiating a treaty which would make for a better life for the Iranians, the Iranians were staging protests advocating killing Americans.  Have you ever heard of anything as stupid as that?  In my opinion the Obama administration couldn’t negotiate toilet paper off of a toilet roll.

We have members of the Muslim faith calling for Ben Carson to withdraw from the presidential race because he made a comment that he would not support a Muslim for President; what he actually meant to say is if they allowed the Koran to override the US Constitution. The Muslims claimed that Carson was religiously intolerant; well ladies it is not the Christians who are lining other Christians up along the ocean and cutting their heads off so their blood will flow to Italy and Europe.  The war on women, I think in the Koran you can still stone women to death, or the Muslim teenager whose father killed her because he found condoms in her possession (honor killing is advocated in this religion). 

Is it too late to save the Middle East, my only question is too save them from what?  I am not anti Muslim; I am anti militant Muslim who will not swear allegiance to the US Constitution.  When Obama made the stupid statement that “the United States is no longer a Christian Nation”, that said it all.

How do our Republican candidates plan on dealing with this?  Some want to sound tough and talk about the safe zones and no fly zones, some like Trump just want to pull out and supply our allies, Fiorina wants to build up numerous brigades of the military without knowing what we need for brigades and the others just throw out ideas that are unworkable.

Our leadership in this country whether it be Presidential, the Senate, or the House of Representatives is in total chaos.  Our military has been bled dry not only in equipment but also manpower; we are no longer able to carry the fight to a foreign country.  Putin sees that and is filling in the vacuum; Russia is building up their military, China is building up their military, the US is handing out two or three free cell phones to welfare recipients.

“I WILL FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE THE UNITED STATES”!!  Well numb nuts you sure have.